Welcome to CogNews Psychology Anthropology Neuroscience
?main
?post story
?search
?about
?
?links
?link to us
?rss feed
?page two
?topics
?
?
?main
?parent
?thread


Re: Buddhism and Neuroscience
by on Saturday September 13, @06:56AM

Not a new idea indeed, but an idea that "pays well". Davidson's star is rising and rising, probably in part because he knows who to choose to be around with, but his idea that positive affect is related with left prefrontal dominance and negative with "right leaning" is more controversial than is acknowledged by many. Other troubling idea: it seems that people who have coped with their early environment by developing an "avoidant attachment" style and who tend to rate their childhood as happy, without being able (or willing) to specify, also are "left-leaning". Those who know something about what becoming a Tibetan monk implied (and this not, or not just, to be blamed to the chinese!), will have a complementary, more troublng understanding of why they can "lean left" so well.

Maarten

Related Links

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Buddhism and Neuroscience
by on Sunday September 14, @04:08PM

Incidently, there was a TV show on tonight, IN England, called "Soul Searching".

About a search for the self as more than the self. The source of inspiration and creation and so on.

A big area looked at was Buddhism, and the role of the right hemisphere in consciousness.


[ Reply to this ]
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
( Reply )

? "Science is a willingness to accept facts even when they are opposed to wishes." -- B. F. Skinner
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster.
[ home | post article | search | admin ]