Welcome to CogNews Philosophy Neuroscience Anthropology Linguistics Psychology
 main
 post story
 rss feed
 
 
 search
 links
 link to us
 topics
 about
 
 
 main


Robot consumers, grow up!
Robotics Posted by Bollywood on Thursday November 15, @12:27PM
from the to-serve-man dept.

(Article Link) Why can't American consumers handle the future that robotics is willing to offer? Our conception of consumer robotics is steered, almost entirely, by science fiction. Look at the best-selling book "How to Survive a Robot Uprising". With tongue firmly in cheek, Daniel H. Wilson warns that a robot uprising is inevitable. "How can all those Hollywood scripts be wrong?" he asks.

Part of the problem is the Western world's relatively short history with robots, with 1921 perhaps being the first use of the term and America's introduction to robots. Whereas automatons have been part of Japanese culture for hundreds of years, according to Timothy N. Hornyak. There they are seen as friends, helpers, entertainers, and companions. What the Japanese robot industry didn't anticipate was its target market's antipathy toward home robots. The more powerful and realistic the latter became, the less interest Americans showed.




The Mind Of A Rock |  >

 

Related Links
  • Articles on Robotics
  • Also by Bollywood
  • Contact author
  • The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )

    Re: Robot consumers, grow up!
    by Russell on Saturday April 19, @06:50AM
    I couldn't disagree more with this analysis. American consumers are some of the most risk-taking consumers in the world. A simple fact of the American economy is that we like new things. However, we do demand of our products that they prove actually useful. $350 toys, regardless of their complexity (or how much they look like us or our dogs) don't interest us as much as a robot that can actually vacuum the floor. Who cares what it looks like as long as it can do the job? The problem with *all* humanoid robots is that they are little more than very expensive toys at this point. The humanoid form-factor is really only useful if you're smart enough to use it (which doesn't necessarily imply human-level intelligence--just a lot). Until such a time, useful robots will remain tanks and frisbees and all the better because they can actually do labor that way (instead of falling down the stairs).
    [ Reply to this ]
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )

      "Science is a willingness to accept facts even when they are opposed to wishes." -- B. F. Skinner
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster.
    [ home | post article | search | admin ]